Syllabus: GS3/Economy
Context
- The proposed sale of a 60.72% stake in IDBI Bank to Fairfax Financial for ₹26,544 crore is expected to take India’s disinvestment proceeds in 2026–27 to ₹82,301 crore, exceeding the annual target of ₹80,000 crore.
Disinvestment Policy of the Government of India
- Government policy on disinvestment consists of; Strategic Disinvestment/ Privatisation and Minority Stake Sale in CPSEs.
- Strategic disinvestment implies the entire or substantial sale of the government shareholding of a CPSE along with the transfer of management control.
- In case of privatisation, which is a subset of strategic disinvestment, the government equity in CPSE and its management control is transferred to a private strategic buyer(s), and in other cases of strategic disinvestment, the government equity is transferred to another CPSE along with control.
- Minority stake sales in certain CPSEs are carried out without transfer of management control through various SEBI-approved methods like Initial Public Offer (IPO), Offer for Sale (OFS), buyback of shares, etc. These methods play an important role in strengthening the capital market through:
- Increasing the float of well-performing CPSE’s;
- Providing opportunity to retail investors to participate in an extended range of stocks and
- Increasing liquidity and depth of the capital market.
Disinvestment versus Dividend Income
- Disinvestment proceeds arise from the sale of government-owned shares and are classified as non-debt capital receipts; they are generally one-time receipts from the particular sale.
- Dividend income represents the government’s share of profits distributed by public sector enterprises and is classified as a non-tax revenue receipt; it can recur as long as the enterprises remain profitable and distribute dividends.
- Hence disinvestment should be assessed not only in terms of the immediate sale proceeds but also against the future dividends surrendered, the value of the remaining public stake and the potential efficiency gains from private ownership.
New Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) Policy
- The New Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) Policy for Atma Nirbhar Bharat, which provides overall guidance on strategic disinvestment, was notified in 2021, with the approval of the Cabinet.
- The policy intends to minimise the presence of government in the PSEs across all sectors of the economy.
- Existing CPSEs, Public Sector Banks and Public Sector Insurance Companies to be covered under it.
- Two-fold classification of Sectors to be disinvested;
- Strategic Sector: Bare minimum presence of the public sector enterprises and remaining to be privatised or merged or subsidiarized with other CPSEs or closed. Following 4 sectors to come under it;
- Atomic energy, Space and Defence
- Transport and Telecommunications
- Power, Petroleum, Coal and other minerals
- Banking, Insurance and financial services.
- Non-Strategic Sector: In this sector, CPSEs will be privatised, otherwise shall be closed.
- Strategic Sector: Bare minimum presence of the public sector enterprises and remaining to be privatised or merged or subsidiarized with other CPSEs or closed. Following 4 sectors to come under it;
Significance of Disinvestment
- Improves operational efficiency: Private participation can introduce stronger commercial incentives, professional management and improved accountability.
- Reduces the fiscal burden: It can reduce the need for government support to loss-making or underperforming enterprises.
- Promotes competition: Private participation can improve service quality, encourage innovation and strengthen competition in sectors where adequate safeguards exist.
- Unlocks public assets: Disinvestment can help realise the value of government investments and make capital available for alternative public uses.
Challenges in India’s Disinvestment Process
- Uncertain market conditions: Weak investor sentiment, volatile valuations and sector-specific risks can delay transactions or reduce sale proceeds.
- Valuation concerns: Selling public assets below their fair economic value can result in a long-term loss to the public exchequer.
- Employment concerns: Employees may face uncertainty regarding job security, service conditions and future restructuring.
- Revenue uncertainty: Disinvestment is a one-time source of receipts and cannot sustainably substitute for recurring tax revenues.
Way Ahead
- Disinvestment should be guided by long-term economic efficiency and the appropriate role of the state, rather than being driven solely by annual revenue targets.
- Multiple valuation methods, transparent bidding and adequate competition should be used to ensure fair returns to the public exchequer.
- Disinvestment receipts should support capital formation and productive public investment wherever feasible, rather than becoming a substitute for sustainable fiscal management.
Source: IE
Previous article
News In Short 16-10-2026